<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Sisyphus Chronicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Management: Mayhem &#38; Marvels</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Room that Eats Speakers by technobility</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/the-room-that-eats-speakers/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>technobility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Hi Hillary - getting the audience to create their OWN space nearly ALWAYS works... subtle and nuanced and almost worth &#039;setting&#039; a room in such a manner that the audience demands that they change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hillary &#8211; getting the audience to create their OWN space nearly ALWAYS works&#8230; subtle and nuanced and almost worth &#8217;setting&#8217; a room in such a manner that the audience demands that they change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Room that Eats Speakers by Hillary Johnson</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2008/04/21/the-room-that-eats-speakers/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=57#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>Interesting! When we ran the open space at the Orlando Scrum Gathering for 200+ people, we were dismayed that the chairs were arranged in rows (we wanted a giant circle). So we asked the participants to pick up their chairs and form a circle. It ended up enhancing the entire experience, as the very act of rearranging themselves engaged the audience, and it became a first &quot;exercise&quot; that demonstrated how Open Space is self-directed and self-organized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! When we ran the open space at the Orlando Scrum Gathering for 200+ people, we were dismayed that the chairs were arranged in rows (we wanted a giant circle). So we asked the participants to pick up their chairs and form a circle. It ended up enhancing the entire experience, as the very act of rearranging themselves engaged the audience, and it became a first &#8220;exercise&#8221; that demonstrated how Open Space is self-directed and self-organized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flying Car? Not for us. Ever. by technobility</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/flying-car-not-for-us-ever/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>technobility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/flying-car-not-for-us-ever/#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>David,

   I do believe I addressed all of your points in the posting... My &#039;objection&#039; (actually more of an observation) is not about anything to do with technology. I&#039;ll grant you the fully automatic systems, I&#039;ll grant you a price point that allows us all to do this, and I&#039;ll even grant you a source of power that makes flying cars feasible.

   Although THAT last one would change far more than the potential to make flying cars a reality. 

   What I won&#039;t so easily grant is that we&#039;d allow a stream of flying cars anywhere near our cities. Even with 9/11 this was always the sticking point - and with 9/11? It&#039;s not going to happen in our lifetimes. If it does? I&#039;ll buy the beer and pretzels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>   I do believe I addressed all of your points in the posting&#8230; My &#8216;objection&#8217; (actually more of an observation) is not about anything to do with technology. I&#8217;ll grant you the fully automatic systems, I&#8217;ll grant you a price point that allows us all to do this, and I&#8217;ll even grant you a source of power that makes flying cars feasible.</p>
<p>   Although THAT last one would change far more than the potential to make flying cars a reality. </p>
<p>   What I won&#8217;t so easily grant is that we&#8217;d allow a stream of flying cars anywhere near our cities. Even with 9/11 this was always the sticking point &#8211; and with 9/11? It&#8217;s not going to happen in our lifetimes. If it does? I&#8217;ll buy the beer and pretzels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flying Car? Not for us. Ever. by David Krosh</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/flying-car-not-for-us-ever/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>David Krosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/flying-car-not-for-us-ever/#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll put this politely, you are wrong. 

The common argument given against flying cars consists of the following:

1.) Flying cars would be dangerous. Imagine a drunk driver not just hitting a tree, but a building. 

2.) Flying cars would require TREMENDOUS energy, from a source we obviously don&#039;t yet produce.

3.) Flying cars would be very expensive to produce, and the materials would add to this.

4.) Flying cars are but a dream from yesteryear, when they said we would all be driving them by 2000. 


The 1st one is one of the best. Why on Earth would you allow someone like a drunken driver to own a car that he could easily turn into a mini 9/11 because he got drunk. See, this is flawed. Because the first logical step is automation of road ways, which many scientists believe will occur by 2030 or later. When you make it so free driving is no longer an option on a massive scale like it is today, you ELIMINATE accidents. That is assuming the automation system has crash detection, which by the way, is already on board some cars that you can buy RIGHT NOW. 

The second one is also flawed. This mindset is understandable, because it&#039;s from today&#039;s perspective. Right now, we don&#039;t have the energy necessary or safe enough to power millions of flying cars. Even if we could find a way to use current energy sources, the price would be TREMENDOUS and not worth the effort. But this of course, is from TODAY&#039;S perspective. You have to open your mind to the possibilities of tomorrow. I can imagine someone like you coming to such a conclusion, but you are not the first. They said we wouldn&#039;t have a flying machine in the first place. They said the telephone wasn&#039;t of any use to them. They said the TV was silly. They said many many things. But they were wrong, and I strongly believe, so are you. 

The 3rd is one very related to the 2nd, that flying cars would be expensive in two ways, one energy, and the other materials. How do you create a car that can fly without using plane like materials that cost an extreme amount of money. How? Well, again, newer, and lighter materials that cost less are being invented and used everyday. It is not silly to ASSUME that in the near to distant future, materials for a car of such magnitude would be possible and even likely. The first flying cars would be extremely expensive, and be likened to personal jets. Only a few people have the doe to own them. But that is changing, too. I believe it will take time. It may not even be within our lifetimes, but it will happen. Mark my words. 

The final argument is understandable. Anyone who lived in the 1950&#039;s or before remember the AMAZING dreams and forecasts for the future. Your food would be prepared in automatic ovens. You would own a personal computing station that regulated calories. You would travel on moving walkways, and you would drive a flying car. You would watch flat panel TV, you would live on other worlds.

While many things predicted then never happened, many have. In fact, I would go so far as to say NOT inventing a flying car would be completely lacking of human spirit and drive. We&#039;ve met much greater challenges. A flying car is not even a speck on our progress. But like everything else, it will take time, the drive, and the knowledge for everyone to understand that flying cars don&#039;t equal drunken drivers in buildings, they don&#039;t equal crashing into each other, they don&#039;t equal being hard to fly, and they don&#039;t equal fantasy. 

You say one of the biggest challenges is overcoming what everyone &quot;thinks&quot; about the idea. But aren&#039;t you giving that fire energy by declaring &quot;Flying Cars for us? Not ever&quot;. That mindset is what HINDERS our progress. You may laugh and say &quot;Oh well, it takes more than just saying something to make it so&quot; Well, you are certainly not helping the drive and possibilities by saying &quot;it won&#039;t ever happen&quot;. 

It&#039;s likely regardless of the backlash, it will once again prove you and ever other naysayer wrong. 

I don&#039;t mean to sound rude, I don&#039;t mean to come off as if I don&#039;t like you, but you need to open your mind to the possibilities. Sometimes even the more fantastic dreams come true. Time will certainly tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll put this politely, you are wrong. </p>
<p>The common argument given against flying cars consists of the following:</p>
<p>1.) Flying cars would be dangerous. Imagine a drunk driver not just hitting a tree, but a building. </p>
<p>2.) Flying cars would require TREMENDOUS energy, from a source we obviously don&#8217;t yet produce.</p>
<p>3.) Flying cars would be very expensive to produce, and the materials would add to this.</p>
<p>4.) Flying cars are but a dream from yesteryear, when they said we would all be driving them by 2000. </p>
<p>The 1st one is one of the best. Why on Earth would you allow someone like a drunken driver to own a car that he could easily turn into a mini 9/11 because he got drunk. See, this is flawed. Because the first logical step is automation of road ways, which many scientists believe will occur by 2030 or later. When you make it so free driving is no longer an option on a massive scale like it is today, you ELIMINATE accidents. That is assuming the automation system has crash detection, which by the way, is already on board some cars that you can buy RIGHT NOW. </p>
<p>The second one is also flawed. This mindset is understandable, because it&#8217;s from today&#8217;s perspective. Right now, we don&#8217;t have the energy necessary or safe enough to power millions of flying cars. Even if we could find a way to use current energy sources, the price would be TREMENDOUS and not worth the effort. But this of course, is from TODAY&#8217;S perspective. You have to open your mind to the possibilities of tomorrow. I can imagine someone like you coming to such a conclusion, but you are not the first. They said we wouldn&#8217;t have a flying machine in the first place. They said the telephone wasn&#8217;t of any use to them. They said the TV was silly. They said many many things. But they were wrong, and I strongly believe, so are you. </p>
<p>The 3rd is one very related to the 2nd, that flying cars would be expensive in two ways, one energy, and the other materials. How do you create a car that can fly without using plane like materials that cost an extreme amount of money. How? Well, again, newer, and lighter materials that cost less are being invented and used everyday. It is not silly to ASSUME that in the near to distant future, materials for a car of such magnitude would be possible and even likely. The first flying cars would be extremely expensive, and be likened to personal jets. Only a few people have the doe to own them. But that is changing, too. I believe it will take time. It may not even be within our lifetimes, but it will happen. Mark my words. </p>
<p>The final argument is understandable. Anyone who lived in the 1950&#8217;s or before remember the AMAZING dreams and forecasts for the future. Your food would be prepared in automatic ovens. You would own a personal computing station that regulated calories. You would travel on moving walkways, and you would drive a flying car. You would watch flat panel TV, you would live on other worlds.</p>
<p>While many things predicted then never happened, many have. In fact, I would go so far as to say NOT inventing a flying car would be completely lacking of human spirit and drive. We&#8217;ve met much greater challenges. A flying car is not even a speck on our progress. But like everything else, it will take time, the drive, and the knowledge for everyone to understand that flying cars don&#8217;t equal drunken drivers in buildings, they don&#8217;t equal crashing into each other, they don&#8217;t equal being hard to fly, and they don&#8217;t equal fantasy. </p>
<p>You say one of the biggest challenges is overcoming what everyone &#8220;thinks&#8221; about the idea. But aren&#8217;t you giving that fire energy by declaring &#8220;Flying Cars for us? Not ever&#8221;. That mindset is what HINDERS our progress. You may laugh and say &#8220;Oh well, it takes more than just saying something to make it so&#8221; Well, you are certainly not helping the drive and possibilities by saying &#8220;it won&#8217;t ever happen&#8221;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s likely regardless of the backlash, it will once again prove you and ever other naysayer wrong. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mean to sound rude, I don&#8217;t mean to come off as if I don&#8217;t like you, but you need to open your mind to the possibilities. Sometimes even the more fantastic dreams come true. Time will certainly tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Baseballs, Mars and Strategic Planning by Bookmarks about Ie</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/baseballs-mars-and-strategic-planning/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Ie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 4 members originally found by quepol on 2008-11-03  Baseballs, Mars and Strategic Planning  http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=72 - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by sammyy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 4 members originally found by quepol on 2008-11-03  Baseballs, Mars and Strategic Planning  <a href="http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=72" rel="nofollow">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=72</a> &#8211; bookmarked by 2 members originally found by sammyy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Notes Numbering Seven to a Meeting Planner by teethompson</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/notes-numbering-seven-to-a-meeting-planner/#comment-1025</link>
		<dc:creator>teethompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 02:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-1025</guid>
		<description>This is a great article full of truth....GREAT JOB!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article full of truth&#8230;.GREAT JOB!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Select a new Technology by How to Select a new Technology</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2008/09/02/how-to-select-a-new-technology/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Select a new Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 18:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=82#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this great post here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flying Car? Not for us. Ever. by JAB</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/flying-car-not-for-us-ever/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>JAB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2007/09/14/flying-car-not-for-us-ever/#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>What type of power source would these cars run on?  Gasoline?  At $4 a gallon I&#039;d be broke in a week .   
Why would anyone want the expense of owning a flying car anyway?  Just think of the insurance premiums..?
If it would require a computer pilot and GPS to navigate itself, could you even call it &#039;driving&#039; anymore?  Why not take a &#039;flying bus&#039; instead since you&#039;ve relegated control to something else?   
Of course it might be easier for that middle aged, overweight soccer mom to stuff a vanilla waffle cone into her mouth while commuting, but it seems to me a continuation of the idea that gave us sedentary lifestyles in the first place, as well as more debt, obesity, sprawl, pollution and countless other side effects that nobody thinks about while drooling over the prospect of buying a new car....millions of people zipping around in narcissistic little bubbles....anything to perpetuate that myth of &#039;individuality.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of power source would these cars run on?  Gasoline?  At $4 a gallon I&#8217;d be broke in a week .<br />
Why would anyone want the expense of owning a flying car anyway?  Just think of the insurance premiums..?<br />
If it would require a computer pilot and GPS to navigate itself, could you even call it &#8216;driving&#8217; anymore?  Why not take a &#8216;flying bus&#8217; instead since you&#8217;ve relegated control to something else?<br />
Of course it might be easier for that middle aged, overweight soccer mom to stuff a vanilla waffle cone into her mouth while commuting, but it seems to me a continuation of the idea that gave us sedentary lifestyles in the first place, as well as more debt, obesity, sprawl, pollution and countless other side effects that nobody thinks about while drooling over the prospect of buying a new car&#8230;.millions of people zipping around in narcissistic little bubbles&#8230;.anything to perpetuate that myth of &#8216;individuality.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making a Date with a Crisis by Henry Troup</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/making-a-date-with-a-crisis/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Troup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=66#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve known for years that this is &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; way to test a disaster plan - and I don&#039;t know any one or any organization that&#039;s done it.  I think you have to sell it at the CEO level; maybe CIO if it&#039;s an IT recovery exercise.

OTOH, I can think of a good few experiences of the real-world &quot;whammy&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve known for years that this is <i>the</i> way to test a disaster plan &#8211; and I don&#8217;t know any one or any organization that&#8217;s done it.  I think you have to sell it at the CEO level; maybe CIO if it&#8217;s an IT recovery exercise.</p>
<p>OTOH, I can think of a good few experiences of the real-world &#8220;whammy&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Simple Wisdoms&#8230; Difficult Lessons? by bas1809</title>
		<link>http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/simple-wisdoms-difficult-lessons/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>bas1809</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sisyphuschronicles.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do the right thing to do now, properly.&quot;

This basic truth has served me well — especially since I am easily distracted and lose sight of things. 

It always brings me back on track, since the right thing to do now is probably not the same as it was an hour ago.

Doing it properly, in turn, means giving it time enough to make a real advancement before giving in to distraction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do the right thing to do now, properly.&#8221;</p>
<p>This basic truth has served me well — especially since I am easily distracted and lose sight of things. </p>
<p>It always brings me back on track, since the right thing to do now is probably not the same as it was an hour ago.</p>
<p>Doing it properly, in turn, means giving it time enough to make a real advancement before giving in to distraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
